What Do they Know About UFOs UAP and Extraterrestrials ?

Show Transcript

Today, we will look into some of the shakers and movers from the military and government in regards to information and secrets about UFOs or UAP and extraterrestrials. With the next UFO hearing and potential new whistleblowers coming into the public arena, it's very important to know who the players are in the game. (00:32) Hello and welcome to this episode of Mysteries with a History, where you'll be taken on a wild ride into the unknown, the strange, and the mysterious. Like you, I have questions, and like you, I want answers. And with each episode together, we will peel away the layers to look for the truth. Let me bring in my co-host, Jimmy Church of Faded Black Radio, because this show in particular is going to be, I think, a very interesting one. (00:58) Jimmy, another Thursday. Happy Thursday to you. How are you doing? How are you doing? How are you doing? I had an amazing day today. I won't get into all of that, but I'll say to everybody, it really brightened my day today. I'm out taking a ride. I'm out in the middle of the desert, and I get a text from Christina. (01:24) yo, Jimmy, happy Thursday. And I was like, man, what's going on? And you know, that, that was really cool. Put a smile on my face and, and, uh, got me home excited in time, uh, for today's broadcast. And now I said to you, and this allows me the opportunity. Hello, everyone, by the way, uh, the opportunity to jump in and ask, uh, the question because, uh, I asked you the question off of the air, but now I'm going to do it on the air. (01:56) Why? Great show, great topic, great idea for today. But is it because you're reading Lou's book? So I have the book right here. I'm almost done reading it. And this is a good preface for people that are coming really out of the shadows to talk about government programs and where you have these retired or current military and government officials talking about UFOs. (02:26) But this has been going on since about 2017. And while Lou Elizondo might be the person that we all think of, there's a handful of other people that have spoken out publicly about their interest and what they know on the subject. So today we will not be talking about Lou Elizondo or maybe a few others that many of you are very familiar with. (02:49) Instead, we'll be discussing others that have, in many respects, spoken on the news to mention to the public what they know. And I do have a few clips here that we'll be watching. They're honestly, the longest one is like 25 seconds. They're all very, very short and very to the point. But with the hearings that are supposed to be coming up in September, October, maybe even November, this is a very great foundation on how this conversation has been going, where it's going to go, and if we'll actually see (03:25) any of these people mentioned today that will be speaking to Congress under oath in the near future. We don't know who's going to be speaking, but maybe we can make some guesses, estimations on who might be. But you didn't answer the question. So let me read. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. So let me reframe it. (03:48) Maybe I didn't ask it right. Did you think of this show today because your your mind was going in the direction of who else is interested in this because you're reading the book? Did that get your brain going in this direction? I was originally thinking of the hearings that are coming up. Oh, okay. And then also the book did also help with that, but there's actually a lot of people that we'll be speaking about today that actually are not mentioned in the book, minus one or two. (04:24) Right, right, right. Okay. All right. So that clarifies that. It's just, so you're saying that, and I agree with you, you're always thinking about That's it. That's the bottom line. You're always thinking about the subject. Who is out there speaking about it? Now, we have a list. Excuse me. (04:47) Bug in my throat from the ride today. That's part of the problem with taking long Harley rides without a face mask. You eat a lot of bugs. Yeah, you cannot open your mouth. You do not. You do not. You ride with your mouth closed because it just... That's why you wear a helmet. But also, Jimmy, I wanted to mention this is that two weeks ago, I did do a congressional UFO hearing timeline and whistleblowers. (05:15) And so is is kind of a follow up to that as well. And for those that haven't seen that timeline video, I do highly recommend you watch it because it goes into detail on all of the previous UFO hearings that are leading up to this next one that will be coming up in the next few months. Fingers crossed, hopefully. (05:36) Well, yeah, and the press release that the mention, because it was brought up last week, maybe 10 days ago, and I think it was Luna, Paulina Luna, That said, we are having the hearings and it's going to happen in the fall. This is a definite it is happening. So, yeah, yeah, it's I think also in that quote and then we'll move on. (06:09) We've got a pretty interesting list of people that we're going to be talking about today. The word the month of September was mentioned like twice. So that's where they're trying to calendar it. And so, yeah, uh, which is next month. Actually, it's next week. It's next week, but a week and a half, I guess. (06:33) It sure would be great to have that happen. Okay, so we've got a list of movers and shakers. Can I make an opening statement, a quick comment about our list? Sure, yours. Which doesn't include everybody on the list, but six degrees of separation. when you look at this list not everybody okay but most and if you drop a name out there and you and you're considering something um everybody is not everybody but most are directly connected to bigelow and the skin walker and to OSAP and to SDI. (07:23) And that grew. It's really, really bizarre. And some are directly involved. Some are one degree separated. But all of them, in one way or another, save for a couple, and we're going to go through the names right now, save for a couple who are not necessarily directly involved, uh, with Robert Bigelow and, and Skinwalker and OSAP, uh, and so forth. (07:52) So anyway, um, where do you want to start on the list? Do you just want to go from the top to the bottom and, and, and go through this? You just want to start with, uh, uh, rear Admiral, uh, Tim, uh, Gallaudet. Let's do it. I think that's a great place to start this way. We want to talk on where we're going. (08:14) So, uh, As Jimmy had mentioned, he is a retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral with a background in oceanography, which is going to come into play rather shortly. Because as you and I know, Jimmy, and those I think watching this as well, there's a lot of interest when it comes to our oceans. and UFOs, UAP, maybe even alien bases, right? And he has mentioned this publicly in an interview that he gave not too long ago, stating there is something there. (08:46) There is something in our oceans, and we've got to do more investigations on this. I'm actually going to play a clip here. It's 16 seconds that... news nation release let's go ahead and play that absolutely we're being visited by non-human intelligence with technology we really don't understand and with intentions we don't understand it all either and this is just one of those great big questions are we alone or not and we're learning we're not so now Okay, let me jump in real quick because you (09:23) brought up oceanography, and it's very important. You can see right there it says PhD. He got his bachelor's degree in oceanography from the U.S. Naval Academy. He got that in 1989. He got his master's and doctoral degrees in oceanography. Oceanography from Scripps Institution of Oceanography in 1991. (09:50) And then again in 2001. This is a very educated individual, rear admiral. And because his expertise and his degrees are in oceanography, spent a lot of time under the water. And also in that capacity as rear admiral, He was exposed to some pretty interesting reports and emails that he has also talked about publicly that, you know, fast movers, underwater situations, and went public about that and speaking about this because a submarine on a good day is 35 knots, right? Right. (10:40) uh, really fast torpedoes and, and things of that nature. Okay. But they, uh, are, are faster, but he's talking about stuff that's in excess of 300 knots and which you can directly correlate all of that. Everybody just, uh, It's a different speed, but if you say 300 knots, you can say 300 miles per hour. (11:03) That's really fast under the water. And that has really raised his eyebrows into what may be going on and visiting us or living underneath our oceans that is way beyond our technical expertise. It is. And he's also made observations that... They're able to move at incredible speeds, which you and I know about, and they're able to transition between air and water without apparent damage or splash. (11:38) Before we continue, let me state this. You might say, oh, they're not providing any new information here. This show, what we're covering here is setting a foundation for those that aren't familiar with these movers and shakers that have publicly spoken about this with their very credible backgrounds. (11:59) Now, you might say this is nothing new. But it's adding a level of legitimacy here. And that's really why we're covering this. And if you say that you know everything covered, then you know what? This show isn't for you. And a lot of the books that are written, documentaries that are created, TV shows that are made, and you say, I know everything. (12:19) It's also not for you. Now, on the NBC News, he discussed UAPs as technology of unknown origin operating in all domains, meaning the sea, the sky and land, labeling it a national or global security concern. We have heard this time and time again. I mention this all the time. But you know what? I'm going to go ahead and just jump a few inches forward here very quickly because Christopher Mellon gave an interview on the UAP show, which is a French podcast. (12:52) And he goes into detail on why he classifies UFOs, UAP, as a national security issue. And I'll play that interview shortly. But paraphrasing, he mentioned that if it was addressed any other way, scientifically, to have a scientific approach, just to have an interest approach, no investigations would have been done. (13:15) But when you put the word threat out into the government, out into the public, and protecting our nation or our airspace, that's when the conversation shifts and there's a serious approach taken to it. And I think with all of these government officials retired and current, we are constantly being told this over and over again. (13:40) that it is a national security threat and even a global threat because consistently, and I cannot emphasize enough, I will be sharing a few interviews of people that we're mentioning here today, that they are aware that there have been UFO sightings across the world and other countries are also doing their research, conducting their investigations on this as well. (14:05) The question is, are these different countries sharing that information with one another? In the same way that during the Arrow report that was released in March, it had mentioned other foreign UFO offices agree with Arrow that there's nothing to see here. If that's the case, why are all these other countries funding these UFO offices? And then we hear admirals, generals, colonels coming forward and stating there is something to it, but there's only so much I can say at this point in time. (14:44) Jimmy, for you, do you think that these people coming forward, it's important? Does it matter? Are they really making a difference by saying, I know stuff, but I can't talk about it publicly? How do you feel about that? Well, I think that should be illegal, honestly, in that we're talking about nature. (15:10) You're just keeping nature from us. If there is intelligences out there in the universe, that belongs to you and I and everybody listening to the show and the people of Earth as much as it belongs to anybody else. The knowledge of that. It's just nature. What is it that you're hiding from us? And you bring up the one screaming point. (15:33) um it's threat so you threat and fear which is what the media is about which is the way governments control uh their citizens uh you've got to do that through fear and that that's it that's the only way you're going to get a reaction out of not only the citizens of the country but also out of the politicians and those that are running militaries and defense forces and here's the thing if you flip it over christina And there was definite proof that ET is not only, I mean, I'm talking about (16:10) definitive stuff here is not only in contact with us, but just wants to do a hangout. Right. And there's no threat. Then there is no money. There is no interest. When was the last time? anybody watched the news or read the news and read a happy story. It doesn't exist. It doesn't, it doesn't, it just, it doesn't exist out there. (16:43) You have to dig for that stuff. Right. And, and so if ET is here just to do a hangout and bring peace and love, that's not newsworthy stuff. It's got to have fear attached to it, and it's got to be a threat. And then there's money, and then there's interest. And that is exactly how we're seeing this play out. (17:05) I'm just calling it out. I'm speaking the truth here. And although the people in our community, who by and large, most of them, are just honest, fun people, positive individuals that are seeking answers, right? We're not here for the negative side of things and we don't necessarily run our lives that way, but that's not what the media does. (17:32) And that's not what generates clicks. And that's not what generates money, not only for the networks, but for the Pentagon and for the Senate and for Congress. And for campaigns and everything else it's got to be tilted in that direction it's got to be a national security threat in order for any action to happen sad but true in in many ways it is very disappointing but something that I mentioned time and time again is if it's classified as rainbows and unicorns that everything's okay and there (18:07) are space brothers in their mind, there's nothing to investigate. There's no point. And everything depends on labels, depends on perception of things. And if it's done incorrectly, you're not going to get anywhere. Let me provide you an example. When we're dealing with a debate, which is very different from an argument, or if you're dealing with a salesperson, I'm going to make this as basic as possible. (18:36) They're going to be using keywords to make you feel a very specific emotion in order for you to buy their product or their service. It can be the best product on the planet. But if they are not tapping in usually to your emotions or your desires or necessities, you're not going to buy that product. Because words matter and they all carry weight. (19:04) Labels unfortunately matter. And so when you classify something as a threat across any board, any platform, any office, people are going to take it more seriously than saying, oh, let's just collect data for funsies. No. No. That's not how it works. No, that's exactly right. That's exactly right. (19:26) And you're flying right over the target as a national security threat, I might add. Yeah, you're flying right over the target. And you're flying a mission here. You're spot on the money. And now let's continue down the list because this sort of idea plays out with this next, which is Carl now. (19:52) Retired Colonel, long career with the Army, has worked for aerospace companies, and was the former director of the UAP Task Force. Now, Nell claims non-human intelligence not only exists and has been to Earth, but has been actively interacting with humanity. Now, where's the spin here? Is it a national security threat? How is he looking at it? Is there a religious spin on it? It's the Pentagon. (20:27) How is the take there? Nell is one of the few individuals that came out, in my opinion, with a neutral stance on this. All right? And so with that kind of neutral stance, does he become front page news? No, he should. The statements that he has made in his position, these are extraordinary words, but Threat isn't involved, right? National security risk isn't directly tied to him. (21:07) So does he make it to, I don't want to say any of the network's names, but you understand what I'm saying, right? Carl Nell flipped me out. And I thought to myself, here is a guy that is speaking very openly and honestly about this, but he doesn't make the front page news, does he? No, he doesn't. (21:29) But I am going to share this nine second clip of Nell talking about this. Non-human intelligence exists. Non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity. This interaction is not new and it's been ongoing. Again, right? Couldn't that be the banner, you know, a clip heard around the world? Yes, absolutely. (21:57) And Christina, you've muted yourself. Yes, I need two minutes to do something in the background. Jimmy, tell us a little bit more about Carl. I'm going to pass this on to you and I will be right back. Okay. No telling what Christina is doing in the back. Oh, she even removed herself. I think it has something to do with. (22:20) with ramen noodles. I'm just going to be honest with you. I know what's going on with all of that. I am going to mention one thing before we get to some of the other names. A lot of books, yes, yes, we know Lou's book is out, right? Eminent. Over the last three, four years, there has been a pile of books that have come out that I think are extremely important and groundbreaking. (22:56) All right. And now two of those books are, hunt for the skin Walker and skin Walker at the Pentagon were authored and coauthored by names on this list that we're going to go through today. Uh, very important books that, um, uh, point things in a direction. And I think we're, we're very revealing. We have Chris bless, uh, Chris Bledsoe's book, uh, UFO at the pen, uh, UFO of God. (23:28) Um, uh, uh, Diana Posalka and others that have released very, very significant books recently. And when you look at the books and how they are done, we see some of the names there, but we see other revealing information that is different from the national security threat fear factor. There is something else going on here. (23:58) And does that play out in the headlines? Does that move things forward? I would say not necessarily so. But, okay, Christina, I know that you're back. And the reason why I'm bringing up all of this is because when we go through these names and the books that I just mentioned, none of them are overlapping with each other. (24:26) They approach the subject differently. And I've said many times over the years, including all of the names that we're going to go through today, if you know somebody's name and they are public, they don't know. I'm saying this as fact. They don't have any direct information about UFOs or ET. (24:48) They're investigating. They have interest in it. They're close. They're moving forward. They're trying to get to it. But have they been in the hangars? Have they been reverse engineering? Have they sat down with ET? Have they ridden on a crack? Have they gone to Andromeda? And the answer to that is no. (25:08) And that includes all of these names that are here. And when we go with somebody like Carl Nell, who is right in the middle of all of this, does he have any direct knowledge of this? Does Tim Gallaudet have any direct knowledge or contact? No, but they have deep interest in the subject, which takes us to our next person on the list. (25:32) Again, in that circle, Colm Kelleher. And this is a very interesting person. Christina? Very interesting. Right before we get to Mr. Kelleher, first, I want to say, Timmy boy, thank you so much for being a YouTube member. I appreciate you. And a little more background on Carl is that he was involved in the Army's liaison for the UAP Task Force, the UAPTF, from 2021 to 2022. (26:04) And he was also had work involved in with aerospace companies, which makes us question, does this give him more credibility when it comes to advanced technologies and UFOs? So I'd like to say that. But now that that has passed, let's get on over to Mr. Kelleher here. He's someone that you've spoken with personally, Jimmy. (26:35) Tell us a little bit about him. Well, very interesting background. Again, right in the middle of the circle, right? But biochemist, very important to mention. 15-year research career in cell and molecular biology. Following his PhD in biochemistry with the University of Dublin, Trinity College in 1983, he worked at the Ontario Cancer Institute, the Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, and the National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine. (27:11) Also, co-author of Hunt for the Skinwalker. So you have somebody with that kind of background, those kinds of degrees, also just like Gary Nolan, cancer research, right, PhD, that kind of background, and finds himself right into the circle of Bigelow spending hundreds of hours at Skinwalker Ranch investigating the phenomena. (27:41) So how do you go? What is it? And I'm going to say this briefly. as direct as I can, you go through an entire educational career path, PhDs, cancer research, all of this dedication to medicine and giving back to humanity and moving all of this. And then just somewhere on that lone desert road, right? A left-hand turn. (28:12) right into the world of parapsychology, paranormal, supernatural, UFOs, ET, and jumping into that research, going public, and then writing the books. What drives these individuals into this? Now, does that mean that Colm Kelleher has direct, absolute knowledge of any of this? I would say not why we know his name. (28:48) I think that's kind of a, A tough one to say. And before I put in some thoughts on that, Android, thank you so much. It says, great point by Jimmy. I think many are linked to Bigelow because he purposely sought out hiring people who had experience with UFOs and government. Also, his SAP was likely more involved than what's been disclosed. (29:11) So, yeah. That's a great point. And Android, that was Android paranormal, right? Right. It's already gone. Yeah. Android. That's a really good point that there are educated, very interested physicists and chemists and biologists and scientists and researchers. that will go outside of the box and take their mind and their brain power into this subject. (29:42) And Bigelow was seeking out those individuals that had not only an interest, but the ability and the intelligence and the expertise to jump into a laboratory setting and get science in behind this. So, yeah, that's an absolutely solid point from Android that, yeah, I keep saying six degrees of separation, pointing back to Robert Bigelow, but Bigelow attracted and sought out these types of individuals. (30:12) And Colm Kelleher, as pedigreed as just about anybody can be, had a pretty firm interest in this. But was it anything direct? I keep going back to that. If you really have the absolute... Now, our list is of people that have interest and are working on the phenomenon. But if you really have had that access, you're closed down. (30:41) You cannot go public. You can't. Unless it's by design, unless it's pushing for that soft disclosure. And Jimmy, at the very beginning, you mentioned that the majority of people that we're talking about here today were a part or working with Robert Bigelow. And he's a very, in many respects, a very secretive man. (31:02) Yes, he has created his own consciousness institute, funding how consciousness works, life after death and things like that. But when Brandon Fugel, the current owner of Skinwalker Ranch, bought the ranch, Bigelow gave him almost no information, did not provide any of the data that he collected in order to help Fugel aside from don't take on the ranch and a few other pieces of advice. (31:27) But that was it. And then as these years have progressed, we're seeing more and more people talk out about this. many of them involved with Skinwalker Ranch. Jay Stratton is one of those people who was for the longest time in the shadows. And then all of a sudden, we see him on the TV show, The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch, not saying much, but lurking in the background, watching the whole operation take place. (31:53) And we'll be discussing him a little bit later. But Well, okay, let me ask you a question, because we have now mentioned three individuals, and we're going to continue doing this, that apparently... were directors of the UAP task force, right? Like one after another. And so being a director of the UAP task force, look at David Grush. (32:22) That's a perfect example, right? So does that, because you are in that kind of hot seat, are you privy to information or are you just doing investigations to Right. Are you shown the secret folder? Are you taken to the secret location? Do you have access to the real stuff or are you just in a position where you can listen to and read and research the topic? That's the other thing. (32:55) Does Jay Stratton or any of the UAP task force or Arrow, Sean Kirkpatrick is another example. He's not on our list today, by the way, everybody, for good reason. Is that just because you are there, do you have the secret stuff? That's the question. I guess it just depends on if you were doing boots on the ground investigations. (33:23) Kelleher was one of those people. And when we're looking at Rear Admiral Tim, he had done, while he hasn't spoken out publicly on his own investigations, he was an avid diver in his time. He was a part of the Navy. He loves oceanography. That's one of his specialties. We can maybe guess here that he's might have encountered something in the ocean on his own time or conducted investigations that he's not able to talk about publicly. (33:54) The same might go for Carl now, but they can only say so much since they're being watched under a microscope. Many of them have signed very specific NDAs. And what if they're just getting the ball rolling by talking about this, allowing people to make up their own minds and start asking questions on the topic because so many people want to be spoon-fed information. (34:19) They don't want to think on their own. But people that have the information can only give so much, can only do so much when they're in the public eye. Maybe for these people that we're mentioning, might have firsthand knowledge or firsthand experiences or data, but can't share it just yet. We've come a very long way in the last five years where more and more people are coming forward, sharing their information, sharing their encounters with very credible backgrounds. (34:52) If it was the year 2000, we wouldn't have expected any of these things that have happened just in the last 24 months. Except, except you are right, Christina, but this is except that we have been in this very position many times in the past. And we can go all the way back. I'm going to say it. We can go back to 1947 in Roswell and before that World War II with the Foo Fighters and all of the very diligent work. (35:34) of people like Donald Kehoe who were pushing for disclosure, were pushing for the reality of UFOs. What is going on with contact? What are people seeing? Getting the science involved and the hearings, the press conferences that were happening at the Pentagon about this. 60 years ago, 70 years ago, 50 years ago, this has been an ongoing thing. (36:00) Now, the problem with that, the efforts were always there. No different than what is happening today. Zero difference. Zero. All right? And we thought we were really close. And we have the cooperation with the Air Force. And, you know, we talk about the UAP Task Force today. Right. Or a tip, any of that. We had Project Blue Book. (36:23) Now, here's the difference. But here's the difference from 30, 40, 50 years ago up until today. And that is that U.S. representatives were. are talking about this publicly. We didn't have that with Keynote. No, we did. We didn't have that with Project Blue Book. I don't think so. I don't think we did. (36:41) No, no, no, no, no, no. No way that it's being spoken about today. No, no, no. Let's stop right there. There were press conferences Hearings, Senate hearings, the United States Navy, the Air Force, the Office of the President, the White House, all of this was a topic of discussion. We had the 1952 UFO flap right over Washington, D.C. (37:10) , This was a huge concern, and it was a public concern. And there were many hearings about this that went on all the way through the 60s. Now, it stopped in 69 when Blue Book shut down. But my point being, the statements that we are hearing today from the Pentagon and from the military are the same statements that were made by the Air Force, the Army, and the Navy in and the Senate and Congress all the way back to 1950. (37:40) So it's always been wash, rinse, repeat with this. So now today, are we closer than ever? I would say we are, but this isn't something that is brand new. If you're new to the subject and you've just picked up Lou Elizondo's book, great. It's a really, really good opening UFO 101 course to go and read and get acclimated to the subject. (38:09) But this is something that has been going on for a very long time. And I would say, you mentioned five years, seven years. We can go back to December 2017. If we look at things like Eric Davis, the Wilson Davis document, that goes back to the year 2000. Okay. That's before the Nimitz. That's 25 years ago. (38:44) And Bigelow and what was going on there and Eric Davis trying to work with and going in and out of the Bigelow circle goes back to 2000. I'll put off an SDI and all of that, go back to 1970. That's 55 years ago, Christina. This has been going on for a very, very long time. And when you look at somebody like Hal Puthoff or Dr. (39:17) Eric Davis that have been researching this for 50 years, 40 years, 50 years, did they ever get to the answers? Are they there? I don't know. I'm saying if we know their names, probably not. So let's move on before we run out of time. Let's get to, okay, one of the names not on the list but needs to be mentioned here is Dr. James Lakatsky. (39:46) Now, he's also the co-author of Skinwalkers at the Pentagon with Colm Kelleher. He's a rocket scientist. He's got a BS and an MS in nuclear engineering, was the Defense Intelligence Agency Program Manager, Contracting Officer Representative, Security Coordinator, Counterintelligence Coordinator for the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Applications Program, otherwise known as OSAP. (40:13) And, and a very important again, right. Or six degrees of separation. Right. But let's get to one of the most important people on this list because of his position. And that's John Radcliffe, John Radcliffe, former director of national intelligence. Now that was from 2020 to 2021, very short stint in that position. (40:36) But, uh, One of the most famous quotes, and it's on video too, by the way, is this. Quote, when we talk about sightings, we're talking about objects that have been seen by Navy or Air Force pilots or have been picked up by satellite imagery that frankly engage in actions that are difficult to explain, end quote. (41:05) And then he went on to say, quote, that he has reviewed the data of our satellites that not only point at earth, but also point out into deep space where they are looking at fast walkers and, and entering our star system and entering earth's atmosphere that we monitor this all the time. Now to have the former director of national intelligence, right? That's that's DNI. (41:41) Right. That's a heavy statement. Now, if we back up. Yeah. Yeah. And so much was put on this. And I remember looking at the video of him making these extraordinary claims. Now, what's his background? He was representative in Congress. He was nominated for the position of Director of National Intelligence. (42:06) Didn't pass Congress. Got his name thrown back in the hat a second time. Made it through and did a very short stint there from late 2020 to 2021. It wasn't like he was... The director of national intelligence, you know, for two administrations or something like that, who's only there for a very short period of time. (42:28) Did he have the access? Now, director of national intelligence is about as lofty as it gets. OK, you have DNI, you have NSA, NRO. You know, you know what I mean? Very, very few positions like that, where you have access, um, for him to go public with it. He was stating as a matter of fact, that these things are happening. (42:54) Um, very interesting. I know a lot of people want to dismiss him, uh, because of his short stint. And he was a lawyer before that, you know, he doesn't have this pedigree or this background into the subject matter. But the facts are the facts. He was the director of national intelligence from 2020 to 2021. (43:14) And for Radcliffe, I do have two videos that I'll be sharing. And Lou, thank you so much for that. I really appreciate it. I'm going to share one of them here. Let's play this one first. Actually, all over the world. There have been sightings all over the world. And when we talk about sightings, the other thing I will tell you is it's not just a pilot or just a satellite. (43:39) Usually we have multiple sensors that are picking up these things. I think it'll be healthy for as much of this information to get out there as possible. So I only took a very small segment of that Fox interview that took place not too long ago where he is talking about UFOs being seen and them not being satellites, drones, stars or anything like that. (44:04) But these objects that are being seen or orbs being seen in the sky and just in very specific vicinities. They're being reported by multiple witnesses, by multiple censors, and they do not know what it is. That's significant. Now, there was another Fox interview where a reporter is asking aliens, are they real? Are they visiting us? And the answer that he gives, it's very telling. (44:35) Are aliens real? Well, I can't talk to you about, you know, any potential alien life, so I'll just leave it at that. While it's only a few seconds long, 15 seconds to be exact, how many times did he say uh or um? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And that's right there, that question. (45:03) And, you know, everybody got giggles out of it. Why? There's a lot of stress behind that. That's the question that everybody wants the answer to. And nobody will say yay or nay, right? It's always some waffling that is involved there with a giggle or a smirk. And I think that's as telling as anything else. (45:29) On top of that, something that really caught me actually off guard is that with a lot of these very military these military people, these government officials, When they end up talking about UFOs, in so many ways, they lose their composure. They lose their public speaking skills. And there's a lot of hesitation that, for me, I find very shocking. (46:00) Because if they know that information, they must be trained on how to publicly speak about it. Especially when, in many respects, you have very difficult questions asked by journalists. the interview or the question is live and they have to show that they are in control of that conversation. But one thing that we've seen time and time again with these people is that when the topic of UFOs come out, if they know about it or not, They cannot answer it confidently. (46:32) Yeah, they stutter. They stutter. Ask about the economy. Ask about education. Ask about Social Security. Ask about the Super Bowl. They can just rattle things off, right? What about ETs? That's what happens. You're absolutely right. And the wheels are turning because they know. They know. Can I talk about this? No, you can't. (46:57) How far can I talk? And that's interfering with the jaw and the lips, right? It all gets convoluted. Yeah, I love that when it happens. Radcliffe, there were a couple of other clips out there. Those are really good ones. When he talks about the satellite sensor data and what they're observing every day, That's one of the craziest clips and statements that quite honestly, I think he wishes he could take back. (47:30) It was, it was too much. It was too much. It was, it was pretty crazy. Okay. Let's move on, man. We've got too much to cover. Let's go to Chuck Schumer. Can we go political? But we skipped so many, like we skipped Christopher Mellon. Can we go back to him? I really want to share the clip. I don't even know who Christopher who's Christopher Mellon. (47:48) Hold on. Don't play these games. Okay. Here's Christopher, as Jimmy is laughing in the background. Christopher Mellon is a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. Such a long title. But we know him from the TTSA. We know him as being a trusted friend of Luella Zondo. He's spoken very publicly about UFOs. (48:14) What the government does and doesn't know. But I mentioned earlier about an interview that was conducted by the UAP show. It's 21 seconds. Let's go ahead and play that. The reason we were successful was because we were able to make it a national security issue and we had violations of military airspace. (48:38) to congress and and explain that to senators and congressmen and they had tremendous credibility there it is right there it's national national security threat that's that's how we got the movement now uh really quick on christopher mellon this is my take you ready he's just a rich dude He's just a rich dude. (49:05) He comes from, and what am I saying? He's a, today, yes, yes, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. Today, he's a private equity investor, right? Yes, he was part of the Clinton and Bush administrations, both Democrat and Republican, I might add. uh, bipartisan later security and information operations. (49:32) He served as the staff director of the United States Senate select committee on intelligence, but he is a member of the influential melon banking family. That's right. Melon bank. That's that's him. And the other part, which he mentions here, and we can never lose sight of this. I've got mad respect for Chris Mellon in this regard. (49:59) He doesn't have to do what he's doing, Christina. That's why I'm bringing up the banking. That's why I'm bringing up his family. He doesn't have to do any of this. He doesn't. He can go just cruise on his yacht and hang out in Monaco and do what rich banking families do. But instead, he has lobbied for the U.S. (50:22) government to get investigations going into UFOs slash UAPs. He has been very vocal about this, and he has thrown his support behind this, and he has deep knowledge on how the apparatus works in Washington, both in a political sense, in a military sense, and the intelligence community. He's got a lot that he brings to the table, and he doesn't have to do this. (50:50) He comes from a huge family, very pedigreed, and he could spend his time doing other things, besides getting frustrated about the UFO topic. And yet he has spoken publicly on many occasions of his interest when it comes to UFOs, pushing for the Tic Tac video to be declassified, the gimbal, the go fast as well, and stating that the public has the right to know about this information. (51:20) He's also had other family members be that were a part of the government as well. And while he might be coming from money, when it comes to having an interest in the UFO topic, that is one thing that can bring the rich and the poor together here. Also, if you are enjoying the show, hit that like button right down below. (51:41) And Jimmy, I think we're going to be going a little over time today. Yeah, I'm down for that. I was just looking. I have somewhere... I have his secret files. Years ago, Mellon, I've got him in a folder here. I thought I could pull it up really quick. Years ago, he had on his personal website, he had a page full of images that were his personal images, probably taken from a cell phone. (52:18) And And for like a day or two, um, a friend of mine, you know, hits me and goes, dude, click on this link and call me. I go, dude, I don't click on links. This is Chris Mellon's back of his website. So I click on it. I thought my computer was going to blow up. I was waiting for helicopters, people rappelling on ropes onto the roof of my house. (52:45) Yeah. And I took all the images off of that page. Yeah. Yeah, I did. And, and, and they included, uh, the Tic Tac, uh, the go fast and the gimbal DVDs. Yeah. Hold he's holding them at the original envelope with the address audit that he was handed, uh, in the, in the allegedly the Pentagon parking lot. That's his story. (53:10) But, uh, yeah. Man, I felt a little guilty, but I'm like, dude, you're Chris Mellon. Why is this open to the public? If you knew how to navigate it, you could click straight to it. So I got everything off of this. That night, I think it was that night or the next day, it got locked down. security access. (53:37) But yeah, I got the images. I do. I have them somewhere. Okay. Did you want to do Chuck Schumer now? Let's do Chuck Schumer because we've got Marco Rubio. We've got Anna Paulina Luna. We've got Timber Chet, of course. And we can kind of lump all of them together in a way. And I'm sure you've got, do you have a video clip of Chuck before I get into a couple of specifics? For this one, no. (54:06) First name basis, by the way. I call him Chuck. So do you have video of Chuck, or can I just move forward? Let's just move forward. Okay. Senate majority leader. Okay. Now, remember, Democrat teamed up with Senator Mike Rounds, Republican. I only bring that up out of new politics, but this is a bipartisan issue, right? So and who led the effort to force disclosure of information related to UAPs into the military and government sources and agencies under the measure. (54:49) I remember this was a 64 page, you know, very serious situation. Under the measure, records must be publicly disclosed in full no later than 25 years after they were created unless the United States president certifies that continued postponement is necessary because of a direct harm to national security. It also establishes, now this was one of the most curious parts about this, and I like Chuck. (55:19) I do. No, I don't like any politician, but I like his stance on UAPs. But that measure also establishes that the federal government would have eminent domain over any recovered technologies of unknown origin and any biological evidence of non-human intelligence that may be controlled by private individuals or entities. (55:45) So flying saucer crashes in your backyard, ET strolls off and you've got ET in your bedroom, right? Yeah. That's now owned by the government. You don't have any claims to the said CrashCraft or any ETs that are eating M&Ms that want to phone home. Or Reese's Pieces. I forget what it was. Was it Reese's Pieces or M&Ms? Let's ask those watching this live. (56:11) Which one was it? Trivia question. Was it Reese's Pieces? I can't remember. But so... But his efforts and his comments on this are ongoing. So I've got a lot of respect for him and Mike Rounds. And, of course, we can jump forward to Marco Rubio. And Marco Rubio's comments, I want your take on Marco and some of his comments where he's just like, you know, people are being threatened. (56:45) UFOs and aliens are a subject that need to be discussed. And, you know, and in my position, I am going to make sure Marco has been very colorful and very direct about the subject, hasn't he? He has. And over the last few years, one of the biggest things that he was pushing was protecting whistleblowers. He had stated that before the legislation came out to talk about for whistleblowers to come out to talk about UFOs, people were already coming to him to talk about their experiences, those with military and government backgrounds specifically. (57:23) And he had mentioned, I believe it was on News Nation, gosh, two years ago or so, that that it doesn't matter if these whistleblowers are credible or not. We need to be mature about this and listen to everyone. That's what he had stated in the last, I would say, six months to a year. He's been more quiet on the UFO topic. (57:46) It seems like he's not on the news as often as he used to be. But he has been one of the congressmen that has really pushed for the protection of people coming forward to talk about their UFO experiences, information, encounters, and so on that we haven't heard as consistently from other reps or congressmen. (58:13) Many others just want information and they want it now. But it seems like Rubio has an understanding of how it works, and the steps that are needed or the checklist that needs to happen in order for there to be true protection on this. But when it comes to Rubio as well, he did help push for the UAPTF. He also does have a significant interest when it comes to UFOs and UAP as well. (58:50) And overall, it's just exciting to see congressmen, representatives to openly talk about this, to acknowledge the existence, to have a bit of an interest or even a passion to them as well that we haven't really seen in the past. Yeah. And and again, and I want to stress this and I do this on my show and I'm going to do it right here. (59:20) This is a subject where politics needs to be just left off the table. It doesn't matter. I could care less and, um, to, to suggest, uh, anything else that there needs to be. somebody's political affiliation or religious affiliation or anything about their personal life, that has something to do with the efforts to push forward with disclosure and protection of whistleblowers in this subject doesn't play and doesn't sit right with me. (59:55) So keep it out of the chat room, keep it off my show, keep it out of here. It doesn't solidify anybody's argument in this case. And the fact that we do have both sides of the aisle, all across, all across. This is a subject that is unifying things, right? And this is a general interest to earthlings. It has nothing to do with political backgrounds, religious beliefs, or anything else, all right? So let me make that very clear, okay? I'm watching the chat room. (1:00:30) You don't want me to chop-chop, right, Christina? You don't want me to chop down because I'll sharpen, I'll sharpen that ax. Um, but we have the same thing though, when we get to Annapolina Luna, who I'm laughing only because I I'm, I'm, I'm steadfast in this. I don't care. (1:00:52) You know, this community, all of it, all of it, when it comes to this issue needs to be the colors of Benetton. Everybody, everybody is, is part of this. Uh, ET does not care about your, your background or, or any of that. And, and we are earthlings first. Um, now Anna Paulina Luna, uh, during the, uh, subcommittee hearing. (1:01:22) Some of the most insightful and direct questions, uh, out of everybody there. And I'm going to ask you, Christina, when she started to, uh, lay it out, were you surprised at her knowledge of, of, of, of you? Did we lose Jimmy? Or did we lose me? Had a pretty deep knowledge here, didn't she? Oh, we lost. (1:01:53) Are you back? Yeah, I thought I lost you. No, but you lost. Okay. Either way, to answer your question, it was very exciting to see a representative incredibly knowledgeable in the topic, asking hardball questions that I did not expect. On top of that, when that hearing took place, she was a brand new representative. (1:02:15) She had just come on the market. And I think she really made a name for herself right then and there of being serious, asking very professional questions, looking for very specific answers as well, and also showing significant levels of respect. So in my view, she was one of the, one of, one of the highlights in that hearing or whenever she speaks really about UFOs and UAP and the government disclosure aspect to it. (1:02:53) So I, I was pleased to see her speak about it publicly. Yeah. And so let's, let's, let's, uh, we're deep in overtime here. Uh, let's, let's move on to, uh, uh, timber chat. Um, uh, Tim, he's a representative out of, there he is right there, out of Tennessee. Very outspoken. I've got a lot of friends, a lot of friends. (1:03:24) that have spoken to Tim on my behalf. I've not had him on the show. I've almost done that, but I've decided always constantly to just keep politics out of my broadcast. It would be exciting for me to talk to him firsthand because I want to know what an elective representative thinks about the subject and so forth. (1:03:47) But what has been interesting for me when it comes to Burchette and also all of the other senators and representatives that have had to deal with it is their mounting frustration with the department of defense and the intelligence communities on these issues. They they're, they're angry, you know, and they feel that, um, because they are not part of the apparatus that the, It doesn't matter. (1:04:20) You can say what you want. You can try to do what you want, but you're not going to get close to this subject. And that when, when a Senator or representative, a member of Congress gets told that, that just infuriates them. They're the ones cutting the checks. They're the ones making the laws. They are the one, right? They are supposed to have control of all of this and access to all of this. (1:04:46) It's called checks and balances. And so when they show up at an Air Force base in Florida going, hey, we're here, they're like, no, we've got security clearance. Doesn't matter. You're not coming through the gates. And that's what they were told. So yeah, yeah, Tim Burchette and all the other elected officials airing their frustration about this subject and not being able to get close to it, I think speaks volumes, Christina. (1:05:18) It does, and the stance that they're taking which in many respects I think is smart, is that they're saying, we don't care about the little green men. We care about the funding. Where is the funding going for these UFO, UAP offices? And while some of us might think, but it really is about extraterrestrials and aliens and what's going on, you can't take it from that stance when it comes to the government. (1:05:44) You got to hit them where it hurts, and that's their pockets. And it's... Tim Burchette, Annapelina Luna, and the rest of the UAP caucus know that. So that's why they're taking the stance of where is the money going, the tax dollars, the funding. And then once we receive that information, it's like killing two birds with one stone. (1:06:09) We'll know about the money and we'll know about, quote, the little green men, the reverse engineering programs. the crash retrieval programs, and so on. So while in the front lines, it doesn't look as appealing, in the background, there's a lot more being done. Let's go to one of my favorite. (1:06:32) We'll wrap up the show with our second to last. But I want to go to Dr. Eric Davis. and and again you know part of the circle right the knights of the round table right that osap bigelow camelot uh dr eric davis um and I'm gonna say this um now he works for aerospace corporation today not an aerospace corporation but aerospace corporation. (1:07:05) That's what he, I believe he's still there. And in that capacity, um, as a physicist, he's working on some, some, some, some pretty, I would say, uh, government level, uh, seeker programs. And of course that's what he does. And, and great, fantastic. But it was Eric Davis that was vetted and quoted by the New York times. (1:07:33) front page with that quote that said, Hey, we got flying saucers, man, right now. And, and to have that now, and it was buried in the article, right. Um, to have that in the article. And I went to Blumenthal and I asked Leslie Kane about this and others and did you guys vet this? How can the New York times? No, it was vetted. (1:08:07) So in order to vet the source, uh, You have to go, okay, where is this information coming from? We'll use the quote, but we can only use the quote if it's solid. So normally, and I'm going to say that the New York Times or most credible news organizations do abide by one rule of thumb, and that is you vet your source three times, Christina. (1:08:39) Not once, right? Not twice. You, you, you, you vet your source three times and if they all come up the same, then you can move forward with it. Most news organizations don't want to be first. They don't. They don't. And if they are first, they are going to, like the New York Times, they're going to go back and make sure that this is not only attributed and connected, but that the information backs up some. (1:09:12) And with a claim like that. And according to Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kane, that I talked to directly about this, that it was vetted by the New York Times. All right. And you have lawyers involved. You have the editorial staff. You have the news directors. You have everybody that is involved. So that kind of claim coming from Eric Davis was very, very significant. (1:09:37) But then. You have the Wilson Davis document, which has Eric Davis and Rear Admiral Wilson in the back of a car at Las Vegas International Airport, McCarran. talking about UFOs and what's going on. And the conversation between the two of them was significant, but it was also, again, kind of pretty solidly vetted and verified by Oak Shannon. (1:10:16) which, again, this goes back to the year 2000, 2001, and there were other people that were mentioned in this document, but all of it circles back around to Eric Davis and these very, very significant programs that are reverse engineering craft, trying to get these craft to fly, and what is actually going on. Eric Davis, does he have the proof? No, I don't think so. (1:10:43) We know his name. But he got very, very close. And Rear Admiral Wilson, he was retired at the time, was offered access to see the craft. And that is in the Wilson Davis document. And there's a lot of controversy with those documents, but to the understanding of the public, they were kind of released by mistake. (1:11:09) So after Edgar Mitchell had passed, journalists had come across this document, and then they released it to the public. And when it comes to any scientist or anyone... collecting data, working for any kind of program or office, they're constantly writing reports. That's what they have to do to let people know what they're doing, what they're studying, what they found so far in order to keep receiving a paycheck. (1:11:35) Otherwise, why are you going to pay someone that isn't doing the work? So this report as the story goes, at least, is that that's all it was. It was just an updated report of the things that these two gentlemen were researching and investigating. And then Edgar Mitchell had it. It was in his office, and it sat there for a long period of time until his passing. (1:12:02) Then, rather recently, it became public. It got significant traction. And then no matter what information comes out, a photo, a video, a document, you're always going to have two camps, those that believe it and those that don't. And I will not tell you one way or the other. All you can do is collect as much information as you can and make up your own mind on if you believe it or not. (1:12:29) But you cannot always take someone's word as the gospel where they say, guys, it's definitely true. You need to believe it. no, I think you should investigate it yourself and vice versa. They say, no, it's a complete lie. Don't even look into it. Look into it. Make up your own mind. And with this report, that's a fantastic example to do exactly that. (1:12:53) Well, we have to look at, again, you know, it's Camelot, right? It's that circle that was happening back then. Now, to be historically accurate about this document, Christina, I have to say, in the interest of transparency, I was exposed to this document at a conference, and by a speaker and a friend and a researcher and an author and who was lawyered up at the time. (1:13:31) And immediately after that, I was, I and Richard Dolan, the two of us, were sent a proton mail with a key in it. To open and I didn't, which had this document in it. So it was Richard and I, and I didn't open it because I was kind of freaked out about it. And I didn't want my computer to explode. I don't know if it's a virus or if it's something else. (1:14:01) I, you know, I don't know what this is. And it kind of sat, I'm going to say it was about a week or two. And then I just kind of circled back to it and I clicked on it and it was the Wilson Davis document. And oddly enough, uh, that same night. And it was, uh, it was a Tuesday and there's a reason why I remember it was a Tuesday. (1:14:23) I called Richard Dolan and I said, dude. I just got this document and he said, is it blah, blah, blah. And I said, yeah. And he goes, I got, I got it like two weeks ago. I didn't open it until today. I said, neither did I. So we both did the same thing and it was very strange why, and I don't, I can't explain that, but we both delayed opening this document. (1:14:47) We opened it, and we read through it page for page, all 15 pages, 14 pages plus a letter, together on the phone that night. It was Richard that pointed out the name of Oak Shannon. which would come into play much, much later. But Stephen Greer was mentioned in this document. So the next day I called Stephen and you got to remember, nobody has seen this document yet, except for the person that leaked it out of Australia to the United States. (1:15:20) And so, so many way called up Greer and I said, Hey man, you're mentioned in this document. He goes, what are you talking about? And I tell him, he goes, I told you that thing really happened. I said, well, uh, let me send it to you. So I sent him the document. He calls me back. He's reading through and he goes, yeah, that's exactly how it went down. (1:15:42) Edgar Mitchell was there. We had a meeting at the Pentagon and so-and-so was there. Rear Admiral Wilson was there. Yes, yes, yes, yes. Anyway, um, that Friday I had, uh, Steven Greer on coast to coast. Okay. I immediately had him on why this is why, and this is why that document to me, there's other reasons why the document to me reads is real. (1:16:08) It's Eric Davis's notes of a conversation that email that was sent out to members of the Bigelow team, the Camelot team, and they all had it since 2001. Nobody said anything about it at all. But it was notes that were shared with the Bigelow group. Now, there were other components of this that seemed to push things in a direction that could be vetted and so forth. (1:16:39) But the mention of Stephen Greer and the Pentagon and a date and members of people that were in this room, including Edgar Mitchell, That suddenly I have a source that can say, yes, this part of the document is real. Okay, and that's Stephen Greer. And Stephen Greer verified everything that was in that document. (1:17:04) So then we have to back up to Eric Davis. Is Eric Davis making this up? Is it a movie script? Is this just somebody's wild fantasy? Well, suddenly parts of this are being verified by individuals that we can check with. And then Oak Shannon shows up. And Oak Shannon, who got interviewed by, I'm trying to think of his name on a podcast, Oak Shannon surfaces and says, yes, I introduced Eric Davis to to Rear Admiral Wilson. (1:17:36) I spoke to Eric Davis about Wilson. I talked to Wilson about Davis. And I said, both of you guys need to talk to each other. I'll vet the both of you. You guys are both cool. And then the two of them got together. And that's another part of this whole thing where it's always cloak and dagger, Christina. (1:17:55) But this whole thing where you just look at it, can this actually be real? But when the players themselves that are in this script surface and say, yes, you've got to back up and say there's something more to this than just somebody's fantasy, which is what the document was originally written off of. (1:18:17) uh, about, uh, Eric Davis, that this is just some crazy, great idea for a Hollywood movie. And as it turns out that people step forward and said, yeah, yeah, that's me. So, uh, the, the Wilson Davis document, which got introduced into the public record at the congressional hearing, we cannot let that go. I think that is very, very significant. (1:18:44) But it is one of those documents that now, out of everything that's out there, stands up on its own and supports everything that we're working towards here. So, yeah, I find it to be authentic. I had questions about Eric Davis over the years. I'd send him some crazy emails. He responded, too. And I was calling him out before all of this stuff surfaced. (1:19:08) And now I'm kind of backing up a little bit and just saying that or thinking to myself that Eric Davis was getting really, really close to the fire. He was almost getting burned, Christina. One of the best ways to hide the truth is to label it as fiction. So if that document was true or if it wasn't, the best way to say that it's not true is to label it as fiction. (1:19:39) I'm going to provide an example before we end today's show. You and I have spoken to Whitley Strieber, and he had told me once that he wished that he made his books, his books about his encounter, he wished he labeled it as fiction. So he didn't get so much ridicule. Of course, that idea has changed since then. (1:20:05) But when we start watching movies, when we start reading these fiction books, it would be interesting to think how much in here is true. There was one very famous detective book written by someone in the military. And I know someone's going to know the author's name, but it's escaping me right now. (1:20:30) But either way, he wrote a bunch of bestselling detective books. decades ago but he was a part of the military he was very familiar with secret programs secret projects and it's believed that he put a lot of the information that he knew in order to create these best-selling detective books and someone someone in the live chat or in the comments is going to tell me who that author is because my gosh my brain is not putting the names together but jimmy that is all the time that we have for today's show who's (1:21:01) going to be on fade to black today Tonight, who do I have on the show tonight? Oh, I have Sheila Seppi on the show tonight, and we are going to be talking about walk-ins, which is what I think is happening to you now at the end of this show. See, look, you cut the show back to 60 minutes from 90 minutes and you got all relaxed. (1:21:29) Now you got to do 90 minutes and you're, and you're, you, you ran out of gas. Yeah. I need more coffee. I need some more faded black coffee. Thank you so much, Christina. Yes, so much. We didn't get to Hal Puthoff, who is also center of the Wilson Davis documents, who goes all the way back to SDI, who is probably directed to uh, uh, connected directly to just about everybody on our list today. (1:22:01) Yeah. Yeah. It's pretty interesting. Uh, and Eric Davis, right. And like Catsky, you know, all of them, Jay Stratton, they're, they're all right there working with each other with a deep interest in the subject. So thank you so much, everybody. I'll see you tonight on fade to black Christina. In the meantime, keep rolling that rock uphill. (1:22:22) I'll see everybody. Thank you. And before you head out, I do write articles for all the shows that take place right here. So if you like bite-sized articles or pieces of information, you can find that link in the description box below or on my website at strangeparadigms.com. And then you can also find them on Medium at Christina Gomez. (1:22:41) But there is no H. Hey, Christina, I almost toppled my water bottle. That would have made a huge mess with all these electronics. I will also place the QR code right up here as well for those watching this on a computer or a laptop. Just scan it and I'll take you to all of my social media links as well. Tomorrow is going to be strangest news of the week. (1:23:01) You do not want to miss it. So make sure to subscribe and hit that notification bell so that you know when you and I are going live. Also, you want to hit that bell because next week is A lot of scheduled changing stuff is taking place and nothing's going to make sense. So you want to be up to date on that as well. (1:23:23) That is it for today. I will see you tomorrow. Be safe. And remember, keep your eyes on the skies. if you enjoy the strange and the mysterious ufos the paranormal encrypted this channel is for you so make sure to subscribe as I do three videos right here every single week and hit that notification bell so you do not miss any of the bonus content I post right here