Top Nominees Who Want UFO Disclosure Secrets Made Public

Show Transcript

As we look ahead into the next four years, the questions of UFO disclosure looks very, very interesting. And after discussing the question of could Trump be the disclosure president last week, the comments, the comment section, there were very mixed opinions. Now, I can understand that We're pretty early in the game to understand that process. (00:37) However, recent developments regarding Trump's appointees and their connections to the UFO topic suggests potentially positive implication s for disclosure. Now, I'm not talking about politics, Democrats versus Republicans. We're not talking about that. What you and I care about right here, right now is UFO, UAP disclosure and transparency. (01:03) And that is what we're going to be talking about right here. And for those that have been following the UFO disclosure process, it is crucial to examine the individuals being selected for key government and agency positions. And what makes this moment especially significant is that both the president-elect Trump and these nominees have publicly addressed the UFO topic in various interviews and podcasts, consistently expressing enthusiasm for for pursuing the facts the facts and with that being said let's get into our (01:43) first person to address also I want to say hello and welcome to everyone catching this live how are you doing let's first talk about cash patel that we are seeing on screen right here so He is the top contender, so it's not official just yet, but he is the top choice for the position of being the CIA director. (02:07) Now, he was the former chief of staff to the United States Secretary of Defense. And we need to take a look at this person's background before we address the things that he's mentioned publicly about UFOs. So he has served as the former chief of staff for acting secretary of defense, Christopher Miller, and is responsible for leading the secretary's mission at the department, including his exclusive staff and providing counsel to the secretary of all matters concerning the department's operation. (02:41) And then previously, Mr. Patel served as the deputy assistant to the president and senior director for CT at the National Security Council, the NSC. Now, actually, his background is incredibly long. He has also served as the principal deputy to the acting director of national intelligence, where he oversaw the operations of all seventeen intelligence community agencies and provided the president's daily briefings. (03:12) T his right this that little sentence right there is very important because if he becomes the director of the CIA, he will also be doing consistent briefings to Trump in the future. And. What we can probably take a guess here, because most CIA directors don't talk about this publicly, but we can, again, just take a leap of almost faith, is that they do look over UFO information because they have to consider all the things that are happening on the ground, in the air, and in the water as well. (03: 45) And what's interesting is that in an interview that he gave to, let me find it for you, Timecast IRL, And another one, he states that there is this interest in the sky and in the water. And this is relevant because the hearing that will take place on November thirteenth in D.C., they're going to be talking about exposing the truth. (04:12) The people that are going to be speaking at the hearing, which will be the second half of today's show. Gallaudet had stated that he has had not only an i nterest in USOs, which are UFOs seen underwater, but has also collected data on such things. And for Patel to say something kind of similar, that there is this interest and people under him are looking at UFOs under the water, USOs, there is this connection between Patel and Rear Admiral Gallaudet. (04:48) Keep that in mind because we're going to get back to that in just a moment. But what's also interesting here is that he had mentioned on Timecast IRL that he wants him and his team and Trump w ant to disclose the JFK files, the nine eleven files, Epstein as well. And what's interesting here, actually, is that in that interview, he had stated that The president-elect wants to create an office where people can make those requests on those specific types of topics. (05:22) Wouldn't that be interesting if that passed, don't you think? Because that hasn't happened any time before. I mean, even the Bay of Pigs as well. All of these different things that might be classified as conspiracy the ories... The president-elect wants to make an office on that for the public to make requests on that information. (05:48) Now, will that pass? Will that actually go through? I don't know. It seems like a toughie here. But it is rather interesting that Patel would even address that publicly as it is something that is still in the works. And we've been told this so many times before in our lives of you don't want to tell people what you're planning on doing in case you don't follow through with it . (06:14) Right. So that's going to be interesting there. But I, and I'll be honest with you, I had not heard of Kash Patel before this. I didn't really know who he was, but he has a very interesting background. And he does show this interest in UFOs. So will this benefit us, you and I, for the push for UFO disclosure and transparency? Because one thing that Patel and Mike Waltz have in common, this guy right here, is stating that the public has the right to know about UFOs, what's really going ide of things, it's classified and as a national security issue now I know some people will roll their eyes and say christina how can you say that how can you say it's a national security issue when these things haven't been mean to us haven't been bad to us they're pretty chill maybe for some of them but there are other cases mainly in brazil where these ufos are (07:48) actually terrorizing people aside from that I've stated this so many times if it wasn't a national security issue tax dollars crutiny, without the embarrassment. And especially we're getting another UFO hearing right in front of Congress. These are exciting times, and we need to look at everyone talking about this, how many people are a part of the government to see if it's going to push forward in our favor, your and my favor or against us. (08:51) That's the things that we have to look for. When we're looking at Mike Waltz, he is the top contender for the National Security Advisor, and he was the congressman for Flor ually Timcast IRL, not Timecast. (09:46) So thank you for those that corrected me in the live chat. And P says, it's exciting times. Yes, it is. And random content. What a funny name. Hi, guys. Well, hello right back at you. So this is... We really have to keep an eye out on these things. And there is more information about Mike Waltz here. But something really interesting that he mentioned in June of twenty twenty three is, quote, if there is some type of alien craft or just something we can we We're having fun traversing the universe in our cute little rockets, hopping from planet to planet. But we've been told, no, we're the only guys out there. Nothing to worry about. And then bam, you come across some intelligent life and there's no protocol to manage it. (11:11) It will be very dangerous in all honesty. Having these conversations allows humanity, our civilization, to move forward and to actually, genuinely, truly become a space-faring species. We need this information. And I thin ame. (12:06) They're ahead of the curve. But at some point it will be mandatory. So you and I, we're on top of it. We really are. Brian, thank you for the four ninety nine. It says a bunch of people elected that don't care about the secrets of the deep state. This is interesting. And something that might take place is more of an interest in this. (12:26) But today we are really talking about UFO disclosure and transparency more so than anything else. Again, we are pushing the politics aside. Doe t UFOs, the UFO whistleblower legislations, funding for Arrow that we're going to get into. And he's possibly going to be appointed for the secretary of state. (13:26) All of these people that I'm mentioning, they're not official just yet, but these are the highest contenders that will be chosen for these positions until further notice. I did look up on their social media. I did look up on the, like, the latest news items on these people and they haven't commented officially on it yet. (13:49) B going to get a lot farther than saying, oh, I'm right and you're wrong. That's how we get white hairs and more wrinkles, by being argumentative. So looking at Marco Rubio, he spoke to News Nation in June of twenty twenty three, stating that there is this official acknowledgement of potential UFO related programs, particularly through his direct quotes about whistleblower fear, (14:51) stating, quote, Frankly, a lot of them, these UFO whistleblowers are very fearful, fearful of their jobs, fearfu these UFO programs, about things that they know about UFOs and potentially even reverse engineering programs as well. And he had stated to News Nation in twenty twenty three of these guys are in fear of their lives. (15:44) And right now we do not have the best whistleblower protections that these people can't come forward and be all happy that they're going to keep their jobs, keep their paychecks and not be hunted down. We haven't really fully understood how to create the best protocols, sadl of defense, Kathleen Hicks, and deputy director of national intelligence, Stacey Dixon, calling for full funding for Arrow. Again, this is during twenty twenty three where Arrow was in a different limelight. (16:49) Now, it's it's not being favored as much as it was. But these three points right here are demonstrating his stance on. on UFOs, UAP and UFO transparency and disclosure. And that's what matters. So if he does become the Secretary of State, it would be interesting to see how he would sh Patel will not be the CIA director. It's actually going to be John Ratcliffe. And you're hearing that right here, right now, live. So this is good news because, because... Radcliffe more so than Patel has very very publicly mentioned his interest in UFOs mentioning that it is so important that more information comes forward and then on top of that he has mentioned I want to say it was on Fox News that there is something to it so for him to be to be named as the cia (18:26) director this is ve once. Nice. It's going to be very cool. Something else we ought to talk about for the second half of this episode. is the people that are gonna be speaking at the hearing tomorrow november thirteenth in dc and by the way I will be streaming it live right here on this channel so make sure to subscribe and hit that notification bell but also (19:28) I will be providing an analysis from what I understand from that hearing tomorrow right after the hearing takes place and then a show the next day go ing at. (20:05) A little bit later, this is important because these written testimonies had to be submitted to Congress twenty four hours before the hearings, but it could be disseminated to all the people there. And then also looking at the information that are going to be covering. The next thing I want to tell you is very important. (20:23) Write this down. I'm going to be telling you how many pages each report was, each testimony was. The first one with Mr. Gold right here being nine pages. 05) I try to. I really try to keep up to date on the news when it comes to UFOs because that's what this is all about. That's how important this is to me and I think for so many viewers and listeners as well. But sometimes this kind of news can so quickly be buried that it can casually be difficult to find on a basic search. (21:27) This hearing is very easy to find. It's all over the place. It's very exciting. But the backgrounds on these people and their written testimonies haven't fully been til just recently. So this is a supposedly significant adds significant credibility to the UAP discussion through his diverse background in both public and private aerospace sectors. As NASA's former associate administrator for space policy and partnerships, He led the development of the Artemis Accords and earns NASA's Outstanding Leadership Medal. (22:41) And his experience spans leadership roles at Red Wire and notably, this is super important, the Bigelow Aerospace. What do we know about Big rtise, and his legal background holding a JD from the University of Pennsylvania Law School makes him uniquely qualified to address UAP policy matters. (23:46) But then... I went ahead and read his nine page written testimony, and I'm going to let you make up your own mind. But here is the summary on that, because, of course, you and I are not going to read that live. It would take us all day to read all of these people's testimonies. But here he states that he allocates for a systematic destigm nd UAP have impeded scientific progress, citing the delayed investigation of the Nimitz encounter as an example. And his proposals focus on practical, cost-effective solutions like leveraging NASA's existing aviation safety reporting system, establishing their better civilian reporting protocols. (25:14) Okay, I can see that is kind of promising. Okay, we want that to take place. But how many of these civilians reporting these protocols or reporting their sightings will trust NASA? NASA has lost both skeptics and believers in the phenomenon. (26:11) So there are some pieces that I'm like, okay, I can understand that. But for NASA to be the central role when they are funded by the government? Ugh. I don't know. I'm not seeing it as promising as he is. But, hey, I have no problem being proven wrong. If anything, I want to be proven wrong. Please. (26:38) But so far, no. It's an interesting written testimony that Gold wrote. What do you think? Before I move forward, what do you think about or UAP investigations across government agencies, agreed, developing a comprehensive national UAP strategy, yes, and creating protected environments for whistleblowers, agreed. (27:43) These three points sound pretty darn good, if you ask me. I can't see any flaws in this one. And the majority of his report goes into these actions in more detail. But I'm just giving you a summary on this. And I feel like these are very promising. This is important because previously... These different government oint of contact for UAP investigations across government agencies, it would be a lot easier to collect data and it would be hopefully even more easy to file FOIA reports, Freedom of Information Act reports. Because then we're just dealing with one agency versus a million of them, right? At least on paper, that makes sense. (29:15) Loki says, I bet my boots and lost. Gotta buy some more boots, Loki. Gotta have a few if you want to keep betting them. Then we gotta get on over to... retired Navy Re d, we're getting that credibility back. (30:15) very quickly before the hearing takes place people are able to do their own research the last one we didn't really know who was gonna speak until just right before the hearing no one had a clue we were all in suspense especially actually no we were all very much in suspense and we didn't really know what to expect based off of the people that I've mentioned so far My expectations are steadily increasing, more so than I expected. (30:46) But I'm not AP Disclosure Act and its Records Review Board provisions, and establishment of a comprehensive, whole-of-government approach to And his emphasis on the socioeconomic benefits of open research through institutions like Harvard's Galileo Project, shout out to Avi Loeb, and his concerns about constitutional issues regarding executive branch secrecy provides multiple (31:56) angles for policymakers to consider. Then, according to News Nation, Gallaudet said that the planet has been visited by entit n the congressional record. And it would be interesting what information and what data he can follow up on statements like that. (32:54) As you... And with that being said, you can understand why my expectations are getting a little bit higher when doing the research on these people. Can you agree or disagree on this one? What do you expect for the hearing tomorrow? based off of the one that we got last year and the people I've mentioned so far with their backgrounds and their public interest in the truth? What's going to happen then? It's knowing these upcoming steps that matter just as much as exposing the truth. And Tom, thank you so much for becoming a YouTube member. (34:13) That is so awesome. Jessica says, I guess we'll find out tomorrow. I am sitting in anticipation. I am rather curious on how they're going to be prepping for this, how they're going to address this, both the people asking the questions, the congressmen, and then those sitting on the other side being questioned. mony will be not only submitted to Congress, but be on record. So in his written testimony, I think it was probably a hundred, maybe more. (35:26) I didn't count them. But I scrolled through the two hundred and nineteen pages. It was a hundred or more UFO sightings that are in public domain. And he cited every single one where he got the sighting, the UFO sighting information from. This man is a true journalist. I love it so much because he had his end notes. (35:53) He cited every single public at they have done in the past. There are credentials and why they deserve to be speaking in front of Congress. (36:36) So all those things are very important. And again, I didn't really think about it, but now I'm thinking, no, yeah, resumes, very important. Really, really are. Schellenberger right here wrote a two hundred and nineteen page report. That is a diddly darn book. It really is. But some things that he brought up before talking about all of these different UFO sightings. (37:01) is he ll be at the hearing to talk (37:45) about the Immaculate Constellation. So that part is a little bit disappointing there. But when this information that Schellenberger brought up about the Immaculate Constellation, it spread like wildfire. The accusations were extreme, extreme. And so for him to be chosen to speak, at the hearing, I think is remarkable and a little bit unexpected. (38:16) I did not expect him to be speaking at the hearing. Really, I really wasn't. But I'm glad that he will be. up on YouTube for those watching live. (39:02) And I would like to... Have you vote on it before I end it? The question is, political leaning aside, do you think the new admin team, Inc., Marco Rubio, could bring UFO disclosure? Thirty two percent say yes. Twenty one percent say no. Thirty five percent say I'm optimistic. And twelve percent says it will get blocked. (39:28) And that's out of three hundred and sixty six votes. And right now we have four hundred and forty three people watching thi world. (40:07) All work says, I'm optimistic, but not expecting much. Adam says, high quality intel is rare. It is, especially when they're willing to come forward or even share that information. Very rare, but the times are changing. That's the exciting part. And we're seeing it happen right in front of our eyes is that this topic and all the things that are happening around it We're seeing the ball rolling, I think more so than previous years. (40:40) Let's see. Margaret says, never trust a t live chat for you as well. I will see all of you tomorrow. Be safe. And remember, keep your eyes on the skies. If you enjoy the strange and the mysterious UFOs, the paranormal and cryptids, this channel is for you. (41:47) So make sure to subscribe as I do three videos right here every single week and hit that notification bell so you do not miss any of the bonus content I post right here.