THE UFO DEMONSTRATION TRUMP'S TEAM JUST WITNESSED

Show Transcript

A small group of intelligence officers working under President Trump's declassification directive stood at a location in the US within the last few weeks and watched a UAP appear right in front of them. According to several individuals, those officials have asked for a demonstration of how the phenomenon can be lured in, and they finally got one. Congressman Eric Burlison confirmed the same account on a separate podcast just a few days ago. Christopher Sharp at Liberation Times just published an article that explains why the Pentagon's UFO office may be structurally unable to release what is now being witnessed inside the disclosure process.

Jeremy Corbell appeared on Fox News this week and confirmed that forty six specific UAP videos are already designated UAP by the US military, and two sources told Sharp exactly how far this disclosure may go and where the curtain is going to come down. Hey followers, I'm Christine to Gomez, and welcome to this episode of UFO News Updates. Dan Farah was very clear about what he was told and who told him. He had multiple sources inside the government described the same demonstration to him before Burlison, Ever went public with it, So this is not just one voice.

It's really a pattern here. And here's what he said on the Danny Jones podcast. Some of the intelligence officials who have been tasked with identifying what evidence can be lawfully disclosed following President Trump's directive, some of them learned that various agencies and branches the military had been fluring these things in in the past and that they had figured out how to do that. And these intelligence officials asked for a demonstration of that as recent as a couple weeks ago and apparently saw with their own eyes UAP.

What makes this significant is the timing. According to Farah, the people witnessing the demonstration were the same officials tasked by a current cabinet member with finding out what evidence can lawfully be declassified. And this is all happening right. Now, basically going through the process of trying to identify what evidence exists that can safely be declassified and shared with the American public without becoming a threat to national security.

And what I've been told through my relationships is that they are receiving a lot of pushback from the folks who have gate kept this despite the fact that there's a presidential directive. They're still getting blocked from getting to this very real evidence that exists. Christopher Sharp at Liberation Times published a major article walking through the structural problem. Arrow's current head, John Koslowski, has described UAP as really peculiar and perplexing.

His predecessor, Tim Phillips told Sharp the office encountered cases where highly qualified observers saw a performance no human aircraft could produce, and that the office was able to conclusively prove that they were not built by us and not built by any adversary either. According to Sharp, the problem is not what Arrow has admitted. The problem is the structure around it. Arrow grew out of the AOI MSG, a group that sat inside the Office of the Under Secretary of War for Intelligence and Security, which handles counterintelligence and insider threat operations.

A Special Access Program security manual from twenty twenty five confirms it also oversees the most classified compartments in the entire defense system. So the question is were whistleblowers ever truly being heard or were they handling sensitive materials straight into the system designed to bury it. Phillips also told Sharp, Arrow does not have the authority to classify on its own, but it can also apply existing classification guides from other agencies through what is called derivative classification. Sharp reports this is what appears to have happened with the Air Force whistleblower Dylan Borland.

Borland gave Arrow three drawings, two were marked classified afterward, and then when asked about it, Phillips didn't deny it. A sitting president signs a directive to declassify, and the legacy program still finds way to slow it all down. So who actually holds the final authority over what we are allowed to see? Jump your thoughts in the comments below.

Two sources told Sharp and a forthcoming disclosure may go as far as acknowledging the US possesses recovered exotic vehicles based on the understanding that other nations possess similar craft and that we are in a reverse engineering race right now. But those same sources told Sharp the technology derived from those craft is unlikely to ever be released because doing so could compromise national security. So even the best disclosure scenario, the public would learn the objects exist and that other countries have them too, And that is where the curtain comes down entirely. Dan Ferras spent three and a half years building the movie Agent Disclosure with direct access to senior intelligence officials, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and former cabinet level figures.

He described that these people told him about the structure of the Legacy program, and according to Farah, the CIA X as the operational quarterback. The Air Force handles retrievals, defense contractors handle reverse engineering. The Apartment of Energy provides the strictest classification system, which sits outside the normal intelligence community structure entirely. They also have a classification system that allows to keep all of this extremely secret that they get to use the classification system that was designed for anything nuclear.

Right, So the classifications that they go by is like outside of the intelligence communities classification system, it's even more secret. And here's the part that connects everything together. Pharah said that when he tried to interview members of the special forces community for his film, one of them ultimately declined and used a very specific language about why. There were a couple people.

There was a few people actually who ultimately decided that it would be too dangerous for them to speak up about what they know. The one that always stays in my head is is a someone who's part of the Special Forces community who is going to do an interview and talk about what he had learned. And then ultimately he used very specific words that have stayed in my head. He ultimately told me that after long conversations with his wife, they both determined he would be forfeiting his life if he participated in the film.

And I always thought that the use of the word forfeiting was very specific and yeah, terrifying. Yeah, you know, you don't ever want to hear and especialists coming from a Special Forces guy. Yeah, And it almost the vibe I got when I first heard that was it was It was the kind of word choice that made you think, like someone else that said that to him, that is the. Same atmosphere Sharp describes around Arrow, the same pressure that has surrounded UAP whistleblowers for decades, and it is happening at the exact moment when an active disclosure process is supposedly underway.

Jeremy Corbel appeared on Fox News this week and addressed the forty six classified UAP videos that Congress has been pushing the Pentagon to release. I think that these are data points. I think these forty six videos are really important. I think the American public should be able to see them, and so does Congress.

They specifically identified these forty six videos because they know that these videos exist. They are design UAP by our own military and intelligence services. I have been exposed to a number of these. In fact, George Knap and I provided that list to Congress.

We've actually released some of those videos. So the American public is ready for this. Now what it's going to tell us, what the end result is going to be. It's another data set of footage the American public can look at.

But here is what I know for fact, Peter. There are machines, there are craft of unknown origin that fly with impunity in our restricted airspace, and our government has been assessing this as a national threat for decades. So put the pieces together. The Pentagon's UAP office has confirmed extraordinary cases on the record.

Sharp's article shows the office is structurally limited to what it can release. Trump has issued a directive, and Fearah confirms that directive is being actively blocked. Senior officials may have just witnessed a live demonstration with the blowers with the most sensitive information are still going around air away entirely. Burlison is publicly backing the same account, and Corbell is reminding the public that forty six videos already exist and already overdue for release.

So if the US formally confirms it possesses recovered craft of non human origin but never tells us where they come from or what their intentions are, would you call that real disclosure or would you call that the next level of the entire cover up. Leave your thoughts in the comments below. I'm Christina gomezlan for today. I will see you again tomorrow at ten AMPST for another UFO News update.

Be safe and remember keep your eyes on the skies.