Strangest News of the Week #102 - UFO Sightings across the USA

Show Transcript

Here are all the strange articles of the week that you might have missed in the news. We'll be covering a mass UFO sighting in the United States, potential oxygen on Mars, AI haunting the dead and more. Before we get into the news, actually a word of caution. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Earth will receive six CMEs or coronal mass ejections ejections. (00:40) So if you can stay out of direct sunlight, it is highly advised. And it's actually getting so intense that parts of Britain that have never seen, never seen an Aurora Borealis are seeing them in the sky. Also, satellite and radio communications are highly expected to be affected. Now, with the weather out of the way. (01:02) I'm excited to bring in my special guest and co-host for the day, Patrick Armstrong from the Vetted Podcast. Patrick, how are you doing? I'm awesome. How are you doing, Christina? I am just as awesome. At least I like to think so. You are. You are. Yes. Thank you for having me. I'm super excited. I was wondering if my mic, my camera was going to work with all these, you know, flares popping around. (01:29) I don't know what's going on. I'm glad you brought it to our attention. It's valid. And some people are already having glitches across the world with their televisions, with their regular, any kind of electronics. People are encountering these things today and tomorrow. And I do want to say, Vito, thank you so much for that. (01:47) And so, Patrick, I want to start off with putting eyes on you. Who are you? And I know I'm really putting you on the spot for strangest news of the week, but what's your podcast about? And tell us about the latest news that you covered on the Vetted podcast. Yes, Vetted podcast. We cover, you know. Right now, the UFO and alien topic, right? The community of what's going on. (02:18) And I do daily videos every day, 12 p.m. Central Standard Time. Pretty, pretty easy. And then interviews occasionally. And most recently, something that I covered that I found interesting was this news about David Grush and Arrow, their connection. Yeah. There's a picture of Lou Elizondo. He tweeted out that he had heard some time ago. (02:41) that senior elements, I want to be specific with some of those words, senior elements within Arrow were trying to prosecute Dave, as he put it, David Grush, for going public. which is, there's a lot like unsaid there as well. Said, there's a lot there said, right? But then unsaid like, well, okay, for, oh my God, this is crazy. (03:05) Just because of the relationship Dave has had with trying to get a meeting, right? With Sean Kirkpatrick and not just Sean Kirkpatrick, but people within Arrow. And this adds a whole nother element, right? Of why didn't Grush go in and give his testimony? Right. And I think I don't know, for me, this was like just scary in a lot of ways, because it's like that story isn't all wrapped up in a bow like people thought. (03:34) Well, when you heard it, what did you think? Was that surprising to you to hear this about Arrow? Let me tell you this. I didn't know about it until I watched your show this afternoon. I was like, what? I feel so out of the loop with these things as I'm attempting to avoid social media. And so when I saw this, I was like, oh, my gosh. (03:54) And it took me aback, as I had mentioned to you backstage. It's not really shocking, like, oh my gosh, this is crazy. But it's shocking enough to just kind of raise an eyebrow. And I think people have had this idea over the last few weeks with information with Grush and Arrow, where Arrow had made statements that we attempted to communicate with Grush and he bailed several times. (04:20) This, that, and the other. Yeah, it made Grush look really, really bad in so many ways because he's saying one thing, but the evidence, and those are in quotation marks, are saying another. And when we're dealing with situations like this, it is easy to make up information. And people have brought in examples that have to do with Bob Lazar. (04:44) People say, oh, this is happening to David Grudge, happened to Bob Lazar, probably happened with Luella Zondo. And who knows who else it has happened to. And I think it's, catching some people by surprise, but I think for a lot of people that have just kind of been in the field doing the research, I think a lot of them can only just kind of nod their heads and say, yeah, kind of saw that one comment. (05:07) But what about you? I mean, what's, what's your standpoint on this? Um, I think you did a great job of, of, um, probably covering a lot of people's feelings about it. Um, to be honest with you, um, Yeah, there was this whole sort of subplot, if you want to say, about David Grush and Sean Kirkpatrick in this meeting. (05:27) But that's only if you're really deep into this topic did you even know about that, you know, if we're being real. So, you know, but more importantly, it's just his testimony, right, to Arrow, the office set up by the Pentagon that's supposed to study this. It's not being trusted. It's just like another... (05:48) another level, right? Because you hear about Congress, members of Congress, at least the Intel community, not really trusting Aero. People speaking publicly and saying they don't really trust Aero. I think that just adds another element of not necessarily, again, black or white, it's one way or the other, but at least, okay, there's more here to look into, right? Like, without David Grush saying anything right without him, I guess he's just letting the email speak for itself. (06:18) Lou putting this out. Is it really about him going public though? It was it about some, some other law that he broke, um, senior elements of arrow. I don't know what that means. Some time ago was Sean Kirkpatrick involved, right? Like how long ago? Um, but if that is true and I kind of do believe Lou to be true there with that, um, I totally get why Dave wouldn't want to go to Arrow. (06:43) And I don't know, it's just another cloudy element around Arrow, I guess. Well, Arrow hasn't really been getting a good reputation with Kirkpatrick being the face of it. And especially with the reports that we've received from Arrow, the first one only being a few pages where it was just a word salad. (07:03) And then the second one where it was a good chunk of looking at dozens of pages, but it was all about all these previous UFO projects and offices that found nothing to do with UFOs. Then why constantly fund it since the 1950s all the way until 2022? And so when we're looking at this, when we're looking at how Kirkpatrick had presented himself on camera with the interviews, when he did the funding hearing with Gillibrand and all of these different things, People are very wary of Arrow and even reporting any of their information to them. (07:42) Now that there is a new temporary chief by the name of Timothy Phillips, I feel confident that's the name. Yeah, that is it. You're right. You're right. Thank you. Thank you. So maybe it might go a little bit smoother. Will there be a new office? We'll just have a new name because we had the UAPTF. (08:01) We had the AOI MSG. We had Arrow all doing the exact same thing. Different people, different name, but same topic. And so with Grush and with Arrow and with Lou Elizondo, it just seems like a hot pot, like we're making some kind of hot pot dish here with all these different ingredients. to attempt and understand what is going on here. (08:20) But it doesn't seem like everything, as you had mentioned, Patrick, is black and white. There's so many layers. There's so much happening behind the scenes that this could all be maybe a distraction from something else. Oh, yeah. 100%. Yeah, absolutely. Without a doubt. And that's the problem. and the solution, all at the same time. (08:42) It's like, okay, yes, and now what? It's like, now what do we do? Is Arrow gonna comment on this? Is Dave Grush gonna comment? Is Lou Elizondo gonna further comment on this? What do we do with the information, I guess? i don't know arrow's got a lot of work to do to and rightfully so to to make up uh like you said for their reputation and and honestly they need to realize whether or not it's valid or not like whether or not it's justified they need to do something about right like at that point you go (09:12) it doesn't matter if it's justified or not we got to do something about it uh if that makes sense right and they are politically funded in a lot of ways so I mean that just matters you know in a lot of ways to get that funding to keep going um they have to remember they're a public facing office not just sort of hidden behind in in my opinion uh right so that changes things um they should have they should be worried about their reputation um because a lot of it is based on that You know, when we'll dictate what they do (09:47) further based on what they can get from their reputation and rightfully so. And that's what we're dealing with the government and these government offices and projects. They do have to save face, but that's not stopping people having sightings, having encounters. And just recently in early May, there was this UFO that was seen across California, Arizona, Utah and Nevada. (10:15) And it took place May 2nd at around 9 p.m. local time. And I know this picture looks like a blob or like, I don't know, the moon, maybe even Venus. But I know people are going to say that and I hear you. It is. But... There have been multiple images and videos posted online in those areas. Again, that's California, Arizona, Utah, and Nevada. (10:39) During that same time frame of people seeing this weird object or very, very bright light in the sky. And it's very quickly been checked off as not being a rocket, not being an airplane, not being a drone. And the list goes on and on. So let me back up. Enigma Labs researched, looked into this and they received about 20 reports on the same observation. (11:04) And what's really great about reaching out to someone to document your sighting to have it be New Fork, have it be MUFON, Enigma Labs, whatever, because they're getting so much information, they're able to see a pattern, connect the dots, but also do a deeper dive on your average civilian of looking at plane paths, right? Rocket launches. (11:26) If a satellite was in that area during that time frame, And so this is where these kinds of groups or maybe even operations do really come in handy. Patrick, were you aware of this sighting at all? Because, you know... Some of these, what we're looking at here, some of these kind of look like classic spirals that you kind of get from rocket launches, to me at least, but other images captured do not look like those spirals. (11:59) So what do you think we might be dealing with here? Were you familiar with this sighting? You know, this is interesting. to be honest with you, now that you just said that about the spiral, the spinning, right? That is interesting on this one that you're showing right here, for sure. You know, it's just context, right? It looks odd. (12:27) What do you want me to say, right? Like, it definitely... I mean, it's very interesting. I guess really that's something I've learned about looking at pictures and videos and, and I'd be curious to get your opinion too, right? Like taking in all the context of the sighting is important, not just right. (12:44) This, this blur we're looking at, but okay. You know, what did other people say that day? What was reported? What was, what, what have they eliminated from the equation, right? Of what it could be. And then honestly, there's also nothing wrong with leaving it at, I don't know what that is, um, at all. (13:07) Uh, but they are curious. And I think, um, like the Enigma, the app, right. Isn't that what it's called? Isn't that what it's called? Enigma? Yes. You have the Enigma labs and apparently you have an app according to Jessica. Enigma app. Yes. Um, Jessica shout out all the betters watching. Thank y'all. (13:28) Um, Yeah, I think that's cool to get all that together and to draw the resources right of other people who are willing to get involved like MUFON as well and get people behind these sightings. I mean, what do you see when you when you look at this? Some of them, as I had mentioned, you know, it does look like a, I think for the other one, it has a spiral shape that we are aware rockets create. (13:55) But according to Enigma Labs, there were no rocket launches taking place May 2nd. So I'm like, okay, I guess maybe there was a secret rocket launch maybe, but it doesn't fully explain. Do model rockets do something like that? Like where that wouldn't be reported? You know what I'm saying? No, that's a valid statement. (14:15) And I think it just depends on the size. And who's operating it? Do they need to report it? But what's interesting here is that we're seeing four states that had similar sightings. Again, that's California, Arizona, Utah, and Nevada. And so I think that really stands out more so than just being one casual sighting in one part of the world. (14:35) Yeah, easily brush off as a rocket, no problem. But when we're dealing with multiple locations, seeing it at around the same time frame, That's when it, I think, begins to catch people's interest. And some of them, for all intents and purposes, look like portals or wormholes. I mean, I love the theme. (14:53) I love the theme of portals. But to be more critical, they do have the similarity to rocket launches more so than anything else. I got to ask you, Patrick, if a portal opened up right in front of you, would you walk through it? Hell no. Sorry. I'm sorry. I apologize. No, no, I would not walk through something that looked like a portal in front of me without like a test. (15:22) Has somebody tested this? Have we sent in, you know, a robot first? Yeah, the portal idea is interesting. I don't know. I haven't really gone down those rabbit holes yet, to be honest with you about portals. It's fascinating if I'm being honest. And so hearing your opinion, it sounds like you know more about that. (15:46) The fact that it may look like something like that is interesting. And what is the point? Is it a rip or somebody purposely opened a portal? Because to me, a portal seems like purposefully done, put together for a reason. Whereas maybe like a rip, it's not meant to be there. So when you say portal, is that what you mean? Something that's meant to be there or not? Or it's the same thing? It's a possibility of either or. (16:15) What our current understanding when it comes to attempting to create portals and or wormholes is that you need an extensive amount of energy or you can use exotic matter, which is the theory of it. And so some of them could be created. with intention, while others might be open by accident. You know, portals are still a great area. (16:39) We don't have a lot of information on them. And if we do, it's not public. But at some point in time, Patrick, you will deep dive into portals. And you're going to get sucked in. You're not going to come out of it. I'm going to get sucked in a portal. Get it? Skinwalker Ranch is a good example of portals. (16:59) And scientists witnessed them during the Bigelow era. And that has been reported. And it's also been reported with ancient cultures, Native American cultures, where they talk about portals. So it's something that has been consistent across human history, where people have just mentioned it, documented it, shared it in stories and myths. (17:21) And so there has to be something to it. It's just learning how to harness it and how to appropriately use them. Yeah. I mean, I had Ashton Forbes on and we spoke about portals, you know, and I mean, it's a way over my head. He got very scientific with how it could be feasible. Yeah. I mean, think about it. (17:43) Say say portal to any anybody. I mean, in whatever language they know, people know what that is. Right. It's a common thing, even outside of film or whatever, if they've seen in a movie. Right. Like we we know the idea of a portal. Yeah. I mean, that's definitely fascinating for sure. Like, where does it go? Exactly. (18:03) Like, what if it goes to Mars from Earth to Mars? That'd be great. And what's crazy is that according to life science, is that they might, and this is like a might in all caps, that they might have found rocks that have a concentration of manganese oxide on the ancient Martian shoreline. And the findings suggest that Mars might have harbored Earth-like conditions with higher oxygen levels during its early history. (18:39) This is really exciting for two reasons. One, people want to be on Mars now. They want to put man's foot on Mars. Cool. But the other really interesting thing about this is all of the ancient stories that have to do with Mars, the alleged ancient civilizations that used to live there. And if that is the case, could this be potential evidence that, of that being a possibility. (19:10) You know what I mean? I just, I found this so exciting. Oh, 100%. I had no idea about this. Like, you know, that's what's great about your show, Christine. Right. See, it brings to light even for people that are pretty deep into this. But as we have talked about, like, there's a lot to take in. But yeah, I never heard of this. (19:30) This is fascinating. It's in the mainstream sort of science lane. Right. So if something found there helps add some credibility right over here about some of these theories or speculation. Yeah, that's exciting for sure. I found the details about what exactly they meant and how they found it and what that could entail. (19:56) It's exactly what you think, right? Like it is kind of exciting. Like other life form could have existed oxygen rich or not oxygen rich. It's fascinating, honestly, of how the rocks were formed and what that means. And even they're excited by it, right? Even the scientists, right? Like, yeah, yeah. (20:15) So very cool. This picture is cool too. It is. And it just adds another piece of interest because from the erosion on the rocks, it demonstrates that there used to be water there. So when you have water mixed with these oxygen-rich rocks, potentially oxygen-rich, you can create a whole story in your mind of what life might have been like maybe a million years ago, two million years ago, or further out. (20:46) Because when you have those characteristics for a planet you know you we we have been taught that life can thrive in those situations so for I don't know I thought this was really exciting and um I do want to say thomas thank you so much and and paul as well I do appreciate it a lot so before what do you I know that you kind of just got into this topic heavily in the last year there's still so much to cover but When it comes to Mars, what are your thoughts or your interests in it? That's a great question. (21:26) You know, I haven't, you know, I've just heard different stories of coming from Mars. And, you know, I would be intellectually dishonest if I didn't say that when I first hear stories like that at first, it's like, OK, OK, what are we talking about here? ancient civilizations on Mars. We don't see the bases or current bases on Mars, right? Like, it's happening right now. (21:51) I'm just like, okay, what? I don't know. But then they talk about older civilizations that could have existed there and what Mars looked like before. That's exciting because... think that's totally possible I think mars was lively at one point um right and teeming with life and whatever that means I don't know but um like right they found these rocks at the edge like you said the edge like the bed of this maybe lake right or something so you start to imagine this lake and then shrubbery of some sort (22:24) right and then all this this ecosystem and yeah why couldn't there have been advanced civilizations that existed um potentially even our ancestors right why couldn't something have hit mars and bam pam spermia right here and we're from that too I mean that's all exciting to me um that's how mars fits in the equation for me I'm sure you know much more as far as that goes I just know like you know I've seen the martian you know like that's I hate to say it that's the extent uh of my (22:59) knowledge there And then also you have John Carter, the movie, and that was just a fantastic film. I don't, have you seen it? I interviewed the lead actress of that film. Remember her, the, the queen or whatever, the princess on my other podcast, she's from Texas. So I got to talk to her about that film and like, initially that was like going to be a big deal. (23:24) Like John Carter, like this is a big deal. We're putting all in John car, you know, and she's just thinking, okay, this is it for me. I'm about to hit it big. This is going to be a big movie. And then it just complete flop. But I, I actually did it. I liked the movie surprise. Like I thought it wasn't a bad movie. (23:39) I don't know why it got so much hate. I don't know. Maybe I'm easy to, uh, uh, to please, but, um, you know, yeah. John Carter. And it had a portal, right? Wasn't there a portal in there? portal time travel to an ancient martian past I mean I think it had all the factors but you're right it didn't it didn't really catch hold like it could have and there are so many reasons to that potentially but I think it's number one I think it's super cool that you're able to interview the lead actress (24:10) that is super exciting and to also just be familiar with that film especially when talking about mars and when we're we're mentioning extraterrestrial life. And I want to hear your thoughts on this because I love, like on Strangest News of the Week, it's not Strangest News of the Week without talking about AI and AI developments. (24:33) Do you think it is possible that extraterrestrials, maybe even interdimensionals, might be using AI to the ability that we have yet to reach in order to investigate and understand our universe? Yeah. Absolutely. Why not? That makes total sense. I mean, what would be past AI? Right? If you think we get to AI, what's past AI? You know what I mean? It's there. (25:01) You know, it's like, you know, half... biological and half. Yeah. But that seems like still made up of stuff we already know. So what would be past it that we, does it make sense? Like even further, some other, we're just, I guess we wouldn't think of it honestly. But yeah, absolutely. The idea of that seems more efficient and efficiency seems right. (25:25) Like something resources, energy, No matter how advanced you get, your your reach and your power also gets advanced. Therefore, you still need energy. Right. Like so I think. Yeah, I think that's totally. I think that's totally possible. They would use AI for sure. And AI is fascinating. Just where we're at. (25:47) Imagine. Oh, my God. Just imagine where we're going to be. It's insane. Exactly. And we're able to see the evolution happen right in front of our eyes where AI is evolving every single day. And I'm not using that term lightly. However, there is a good side and a bad side to AI, just like any piece of technology, which leads us into our next article that has been actually posted across multiple news outlets where it's dealing with artificial intelligence and And how it can almost haunt you. (26:23) Use a dead person's memories and mannerisms and connect with you. This is something that has been talked about, I would say, over the last year and a half or so. But it's becoming more prevalent. People are really considering this as a more detrimental possibility because when someone mourns for a loved one, they're more susceptible to lies and to things that at the end will very... (26:51) will be detrimental to their mentality, maybe even their health as well. So here, what we're looking at are these things called grief bots, dead bots, or death bots. And it could very soon, if it's not happening already, which it kind of is, could become a reality with several firms now offering this service to be able to speak to your dead Aunt Susan, to be able to communicate maybe with Albert Einstein. (27:21) And to just feel their, quote, love, right? Share their memories where you're able to tell them how your day went. In your opinion, Patrick, do you think this has good ideas to this? Or should we avoid it like the plague? I mean... you know, society will get what it wants. You know, it's, it's demand. (27:50) There's demand for it. They'll do it. A lot of times these things are tools. It's how we use the tools, right? Anything we create can be used improperly. Like as I was going through this article that you shared with me about it, honestly, it was quite fascinating. I never heard of this. These grief bots. (28:09) It seems inevitable that it will go there. and again it's just going to be how people use it or is the person that passes away going to pass off the rights can the person that they passed it to turn it off whenever they want or the person no it has to go 10 years you've got to be with me 10 years and let's be real that technology will get better and better better to where it's you may not tell the difference could we never die and is that transfer still us and then what there's these copies of us (28:41) floating around like I don't know. I find it fascinating. Well, they then meld that into some sort of robotic interface, right? Where you've got something that's not just on an app or on your phone or what will it look like? Be a picture that moves, right? I mean, there's a lot to consider there. (28:56) And then what can you change them, you know, to whatever you want to look like or to say, or I don't know. I think it's just going to be up for people to use, but yeah, I think the technology will come out regardless. it just will and then it's a service that you'll either sign up for or won't I'm sure there'll be some horror stories and they sound horrific I can't imagine they gave some of the scenarios in the article and it does it sounds uh horrific especially when it involves children right not (29:27) understanding oh mom is still talking to us what's going on I don't get it is that real is that not like maybe not offering it to people that still are figuring out those sorts of things you know what I mean like I don't know that's a tough one adults only potentially can use the technology I don't know but then you know you get into parenting and children and what are the rights uh I mean there's a lot to consider honestly from this simple article um to be honest with you that's why it's a great article christina (30:01) There is a lot to consider. And when you are communicating with the quote dead, there is no grieving period. And that's something that we all have to go through at our own time. Some take longer than others. But if you're still communicating with who knows whoever has ever passed away, you will never heal from that. (30:18) And so AI, it's just... Evolving exponentially. And first we had Replica. Create your own imaginary partner, right? Be in a relationship with them. And that skyrocketed. I mean, it had phenomenal reviews and downloads and all of that stuff. Wait, that's a real thing? Yeah, it's been a real thing for the last year or two. (30:45) Replica with a K. Okay. Oh, I never heard of that. I didn't know that. No, it's... People can have relationships with an AI? Mm-hmm. Yeah. And there's... Oh. Yes. I mean, that's inevitable too, right? Let's be real. That seems inevitable. Well, It is. It is. Not that it's right or wrong. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. (31:07) I'm just saying that seems like that's... It's inevitable. It's going to happen. I mean, at some point, we're going to have the replicants like from Blade Runner. We are heading that way, especially all the robots that are being incorporated with machine learning. And to be able to learn after a conversation and know more about you, collecting that data that you have when you're having a conversation with, like Sophia, for instance, and Amica, and the list goes on and on. (31:32) But when we're dealing with having these apps that will soon be available, and some of them are already available, we've seen this before. It's the same thing. There was an AI that came out, I want to say... I want to say like six or eight months ago where you could talk to Jesus and talk about the Bible, talk about all of these different things that did not take off very well. (31:57) Then you with chat GPT, for instance, Jesus got rejected. He got poor Jesus. Oh my God. Two crosses in one life. That's horrible. Poor Jesus, man. How did that not take off? That is horrible. That poor guy. I'm sorry. Yeah. But there's more because then you also have ChatGPT or these other AI platforms to explain something to you like Aristotle, like Albert Einstein. (32:30) And so... This can either be beneficial or detrimental to humanity. It just really depends on the person and how they want to use it. And it's really just to each their own here. But I think on the positive side, AI will help us explore the universe better than ever that we simply are not able to do without it. (32:49) Yeah. It's able to find patterns faster than we can find exoplanets that have techno signatures better than we can. And the list goes on and on. And so in that point of view, it's great in the emotional point of view. It's not rocking with you. I'm with you. Well, it's it's. You know. I've always thought about this too. (33:17) People say, oh, advanced civilization. And you immediately, your mind jumps to big buildings and electronics and flying around. Why is that advanced? You know what I mean? We're setting up our own future. Why is that what is advancement? You know what I mean? Why do we need that? What are we giving up to have it? Right. (33:41) We're in a particularly weird time in humanity. We just are. We're lucky to be alive right now. We're at the greatest humanity has ever had it. And on top of that, we're seeing I like the word used earlier evolution in many ways, not just with AI, but with how society is just ran every day and the expectations of a human. (34:06) And it's getting better where, you know what I mean? More people are getting to a point where. whatever they have more time on their hands they could focus on different things which is interesting and it's changing the world and again we're advancing but are we is that advanced technology to me it's just new technology not necessarily advanced because that is it I mean how far are we going to go before we're not human and nothing matters if you know does that make sense like I don't know. (34:37) It's just interesting to me. I don't know how, you know what I mean? What are we giving up is basically the question. You're bringing up some very legitimate points. You really are. There's also, I don't know if you know this, but there's a whole job. Thank you. No, continue along that. I'm bringing up good points. (34:58) Go ahead, Christina. I just want to give you some space there. I'm just kidding. You're bringing up some great points, Patrick. But there's also, there's a whole job section, a whole job category of AI ethics, of how is it affecting humanity? What can it do? But looking at evolution and the advancements of humanity, what you had stated of, is it big buildings? Is it just bigger and better technology? Exactly. (35:24) And you know what? Maybe it's not. Maybe it's the evolution has to begin in the mind of being a better person. Right now, while we've evolved technologically in the last 100 years, 200 years. We haven't mentally. We're still just as brutal and cruel as ever, maybe even worse. I mean, the narcissism has gone through the roof in the last 10 years compared to any other point in time. (35:51) Does that make us more advanced because we have cell phones that are like these tiny computers in our pockets? Yeah, so when you place it like that, you got me rolling in my brain of like, yes, continue onward, Patrick. Because... It's something that we all need to consider. Is advancements the next iPhone? Is it the next, I don't know, Neuralink chip? No, I don't think so. (36:21) Exactly. Yeah. And there's no stopping the machine, right? No. You know, what do we do? Next will be like the Borg. Yeah. Yeah. It's going to be like, what was that movie? Snow Train or something or snow. You know what I'm talking about? Snow Hoarder or I don't know. That Korean movie with Chris Evans where they're on that train and all of humanity is on that train in the winter apocalypse. (36:51) And the classes, you know, the rich at the front and the