Alien Mummies Have Non-Human Fingerprints: Stanford Scientist

Show Transcript

Stanford's Dr. Garry Nolan just revealed why he didn't want to analyze those controversial tridactyl mummies from Peru, while simultaneously making breakthrough discoveries about consciousness as an interface with non-human intelligence. These are two completely different research tracks that are reshaping our understanding of the phenomenon.

Today we're breaking down two major interviews from this week where Nolan discusses his separate investigations, the scientific problems with the tridactyl specimen analysis and his groundbreaking consciousness interface research. As always, you can find the sources in my detailed articles at UFONews.co along with in the description box below.

Hey, Ufologers, I'm Cristina Gomez and welcome to this episode of UFO News Updates.

CLIP - Dr. Garry Nolan speaking on Disclosure Team: "Now, one of the things that I found interesting were the fingerprints that seem to be of a different character than you would expect from human or monkey. So if we were considering that these things were constructed, you know, or hoaxed. Sure. The fact that they have fingerprints is interesting."

Dr. Nolan's analysis of the Peruvian tridactyl specimens focused purely on biological and forensic science. While speaking with Vinnie Adams on his show Disclosure Team, he identified specific anomalies that caught his scientific attention. Fingerprints that don't match human or known primate characteristics.

However, Nolan makes clear distinctions about these specimens. Some are obviously constructed, while others show genuine age through carbon dating. And let me provide a little bit of important context here. I recently spoke with the research team from Peru, and they clarified a crucial detail about this particular controversy.

The Peruvian Ministry of Culture confiscated what they determined were constructed dolls from an airport shipment. However, the ministry then used these confiscated dolls to make a broader claim, arguing that because these particular specimens were fake, all the bodies in the research team's possessions must also be fraudulent.

And this represents a significant logical leap that the research team is now challenging through an active lawsuit. The team maintains that the confiscated dolls are separate from the overall larger specimens that have undergone extensive analysis. And I've covered this entire controversy in detail through my Nazca Body series and interviews on my channel. And I will link that playlist in the description box below for anyone wanting the full background on the entire situation.

When it comes to genetic explanations, Nolan explained that single mutilations like the polydactyl can account for the complex anatomical features observed. As he noted, evolution doesn't work quite like that. Multiple genetic modifications across the genome would be required, making this a much more complex biological question than simple finger count variations, which biologist Ricardo Rangel goes into detail on that, specifically on the body Maria, which has now been explained is actually a male instead of a female.

CLIP - Dr. Garry Nolan speaking on Disclosure Team: "You can't do good science under the public glare because people who want results and updates every week or every other week, what they're doing is risking putting under duress the people who are trying to give the information, because you'll give information and you'll say, I think it might be this. And then a week later, you might think something different, but it's too late because The Daily Mail has already said Stanford scientist sequences alien baby...So people asked, I saw in your thread many times, you know, have I been asked to study the mummies? And yes, I mean, probably a few dozen times and by various people, but by serious people able to actually enact an outcome with the mummies or with money behind it. The first time I was asked, one of the requirements was that I would, every moment would be filmed. And I said, no, I'm not going to be filmed. And this is not the Kardashians. That's not science is done. My students certainly wouldn't put up with it and Stanford wouldn't allow it."

That is the explanation as to why Nolan declined to analyze the specimens. Nolan estimated $5 million would be needed for proper analysis, funding multiple research teams, ensuring appropriate controls, and preparing for peer-reviewed publication. And he suggests that competent scientists in South America could settle the matter in one or two years, but they need proper resources and protection from media pressure.

Now completely separate from the tridactyl specimens, Nolan has been conducting brain imaging studies of UAP witnesses. And this research emerged from his work with the Pentagon, analyzing individuals who reported health effects about UAP encounters.

CLIP - Dr. Garry Nolan speaking on the Lehto Files: "The majority of the receiver aspects of human interaction with these, whatever they are, alleged joy imagined, entities involve meditative states or, frankly, psychedelic drugs that change how your brain functions. And, you know, the skeptic, the real skeptic, not the ones that tweet nonstop, would say, oh, well, that's because they're hallucinating and they're on drugs. Or the scientist would say it allows you to access alternative states of consciousness."

As documented in his previous Stanford research and mentioned on the Leto files, this consciousness research focuses on measurable brain state changes during alleged encounters. And Nolan's data shows consistent patterns involving suppression of the default mode network, essentially the brain's sense of self. And when this network is suppressed through meditation, psychedelics, or other means, individuals report accessing different states of awareness.

Which approach do you think is more valuable? Traditional forensic analysis of physical specimens or brain imaging studies of witnesses? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

CLIP - Dr. Garry Nolan speaking on the Lehto Files: "And so suddenly, having backed myself into this corner, AI pops up, which now enables me to look at all of this data with truly superhuman capability and contextualize the data fully. So I actually now have on my shoulder both the devil and the angel of AI that can whisper in my ear and help me understand what the data means. But they are the same as colleague X or colleagues Y at Institute Z or Alpha, who I have to listen to what they are telling me and then try to put it all together into a picture that makes sense. But now I don't have to make those phone calls or be friends with that person on the other side of the planet who's the expert in this because the expert now is the AI."

AI is revolutionizing both areas of Nolan's research. For consciousness research, AI helps analyze complex brain image data sets. For material analysis, it enables processing of massive spectral data that was previously beyond human capabilities. His brain imaging studies reveal that individuals with certain genetic variants may have enhanced sensitivity to electromagnetic fields or other environmental factors.

And his research implies that developing human consciousness capabilities could be crucial for future contact scenarios. If consciousness truly serves as an interface mechanism, then understanding and training these abilities becomes essential for humanity's development.

Meanwhile, his materials and specimen analysis focuses on determining whether physical evidence represents genuinely anomalous biology or technology. And these forensic questions require traditional scientific methods, proper funding, and protection from media sensationalism.

Dr. Nolan's work demonstrates how serious UAP research requires multiple distinct approaches operating simultaneously. The key insights is that breakthrough understanding may come from consciousness research rather than physical artifacts, or vice versa.

Do you think consciousness-based research or physical evidence analysis is more likely to provide breakthrough insights into the UFO phenomena? And should these investigations remain separate or be integrated? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

I'm Cristina Gomez and that is it for today. I will see you next time. Be safe and remember, keep your eyes on the skies.

If you enjoyed today's show, hit that like button. And if you're not subscribed, what are you waiting for? Hit the notification bell as I do daily UFO news and updates. Fresh UAP stories, government disclosures, and breaking developments land here every single day.